Florida Civics Literacy Practice Exam

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $2.99 payment

Study for the Florida Civics Literacy Exam. Get ready with engaging flashcards and comprehensive multiple-choice questions. Each question includes hints and explanations to enhance your learning experience.

Each practice test/flash card set has 50 randomly selected questions from a bank of over 500. You'll get a new set of questions each time!

Practice this question and more.

How did the holding in the United States Supreme Court case Miranda versus Arizona (1966) impact criminal defendants?

Right to remain silent
Right to a public defender
Protection against self-incrimination
Right to a speedy trial

The correct answer is: Protection against self-incrimination

The holding in the United States Supreme Court case Miranda versus Arizona (1966) had a significant impact on criminal defendants, as it established the right to protection against self-incrimination. This means that criminal defendants must be informed of their constitutional right to remain silent and not be forced to incriminate themselves during police interrogations. This decision was made in order to ensure that individuals are aware of their rights and are able to exercise them during the criminal justice process. Options A, B, and D are incorrect because they do not accurately represent the specific impact of the Miranda case. While criminal defendants do have the right to remain silent as a result of this case, it also established the right to protection against self-incrimination, which is not the same as the right to a public defender or a speedy trial. Therefore, option C is the most accurate and specific answer.